From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Sterngold v. 269 Realty Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Oct 24, 1950
277 App. Div. 979 (N.Y. App. Div. 1950)

Opinion

October 24, 1950.

Present — Peck, P.J., Glennon, Dore, Van Voorhis and Shientag, JJ.; Dore, J., concurs only in the result and votes to affirm.


Order, so far as appealed from, denying defendant's motion to dismiss the complaint, unanimously affirmed, with $20 costs and disbursements to respondents. While the complaint does not state a cause of action as to elevator service, it does state a cause of action as to doorman service. Settle order on notice allowing defendant ten days to answer after service of a copy of the order herein and fixing another date for placing the case on the Day Calendar for trial.


Summaries of

Sterngold v. 269 Realty Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Oct 24, 1950
277 App. Div. 979 (N.Y. App. Div. 1950)
Case details for

Sterngold v. 269 Realty Inc.

Case Details

Full title:HARRY M. STERNGOLD, in Behalf of Himself and All Other Tenants Similarly…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Oct 24, 1950

Citations

277 App. Div. 979 (N.Y. App. Div. 1950)

Citing Cases

Shongut v. Leavy

The record establishes that plaintiffs occupied their respective apartments under provisions of a standard…

Shongut v. Leavy

The record establishes that plaintiffs occupied their respective apartments under provisions of a standard…