From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Stern v. Ins. Co. of North America

Supreme Court of New Jersey
May 7, 1973
303 A.2d 883 (N.J. 1973)

Opinion

Argued March 20, 1973 —

Decided May 7, 1973.

Appeal from the Superior Court, Appellate Division.

Mr. Marvin A. Sachs, argued the cause for plaintiffs-appellants. ( Messrs. Feuerstein, Sachs Maitlin, attorneys; Mr. Leonard Rosenstein, of counsel.)

Mr. David P. Loughran argued the cause for defendant-respondent ( Messrs. Sutton, Ward, Sutton, Heim O'Malley, attorneys; Mr. David P. Loughran, on the brief.)


The issue in this case is whether an exclusion of a "business pursuit" in an insurance liability policy includes service as an "outside" director of a bank. The trial court and the Appellate Division found that such service was within the exclusion. We agree.

For affirmance — Chief Justice WEINTRAUB, Justices JACOBS, PROCTOR, HALL, MOUNTAIN and SULLIVAN, and Judge CONFORD — 7.

For reversal — None.


Summaries of

Stern v. Ins. Co. of North America

Supreme Court of New Jersey
May 7, 1973
303 A.2d 883 (N.J. 1973)
Case details for

Stern v. Ins. Co. of North America

Case Details

Full title:LAWRENCE STERN AND ROSALIND STERN, PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS, v. INSURANCE…

Court:Supreme Court of New Jersey

Date published: May 7, 1973

Citations

303 A.2d 883 (N.J. 1973)
303 A.2d 883

Citing Cases

Buirkle v. Hanover Ins. Companies

See also Sandoval, Annotation, 48 A.L.R.3d at 1100-01 1992 Supp. at 101-03). (iii) Multiple Non-investment…

Shapiro v. Glens Falls Insurance Company

y engaged in a `business pursuit' than is, for example, a corporate stockholder" simply does not square with…