From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

STERN v. INDEMNITY INSURANCE CO. OF NORTH AM

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department
Apr 8, 1938
167 Misc. 446 (N.Y. App. Term 1938)

Opinion

April 8, 1938.

Appeal from the Municipal Court of the City of New York, Borough of Manhattan, First District.

Frank Gonnet [ Claude L. Gonnet of counsel], for the plaintiff, appellant.

Julius L. Goldstein, for the defendant, respondent.


The assignment to plaintiff in payment of his fee is expressly sanctioned by section 275 of the Penal Law. To constitute the offense contemplated by section 274 of the Penal Law the primary purpose of the assignment must be to enable plaintiff to bring a suit, and this intent may not be merely incidental and contingent. ( Moses v. McDivitt, 88 N.Y. 62.)

Judgment reversed, with thirty dollars costs, and judgment directed in favor of the plaintiff for the sum demanded in the complaint. Plaintiff's appeal from order and defendant's appeal from resettled judgment dismissed.

All concur. Present — LYDON, FRANKENTHALER and SHIENTAG, JJ.


Summaries of

STERN v. INDEMNITY INSURANCE CO. OF NORTH AM

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department
Apr 8, 1938
167 Misc. 446 (N.Y. App. Term 1938)
Case details for

STERN v. INDEMNITY INSURANCE CO. OF NORTH AM

Case Details

Full title:WILLIAM A. STERN, II, Appellant, Respondent, v. INDEMNITY INSURANCE…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department

Date published: Apr 8, 1938

Citations

167 Misc. 446 (N.Y. App. Term 1938)
4 N.Y.S.2d 73

Citing Cases

Sprung v. Jaffe

( Ransom v. Cutting, 188 N.Y. 447, 452.) It is true, of course, that the statute is violated only if the…

Knobel v. Hoffman Inc.

The section 490 Jud. of the Judiciary Law exception appears to apply only to services actually rendered in…