From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Stern v. Harrold

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department
May 28, 1958
12 Misc. 2d 73 (N.Y. App. Term 1958)

Opinion

May 28, 1958

Appeal from the Municipal Court of the City of New York, Borough of Manhattan, DARWIN W. TELESFORD, J.

Arthur W. Baily for appellant.

Simon N. Hilliman for respondent.


The repeated and unjustified defaults on the part of the tenant in the payment of rent constitute a violation of a substantial obligation of the tenancy ( 974 Realty Corp. v. Ledford, 9 Misc.2d 240; Gilbert v. Becker, 142 N.Y.S.2d 888).

The final order should be reversed, with $30 costs, and final order directed for landlord as prayed for in petition, with costs.

HOFSTADTER, J.P., HECHT and TILZER, JJ., concur.

Final order reversed, etc.


Summaries of

Stern v. Harrold

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department
May 28, 1958
12 Misc. 2d 73 (N.Y. App. Term 1958)
Case details for

Stern v. Harrold

Case Details

Full title:IRWIN STERN, Appellant, v. BEATRICE HARROLD, Respondent

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department

Date published: May 28, 1958

Citations

12 Misc. 2d 73 (N.Y. App. Term 1958)
174 N.Y.S.2d 484

Citing Cases

Stern v. Carroll

Per Curiam. The need to bring repeated summary proceedings for nonpayment of rent establishes prima facie a…

National Shoes v. Annex Camera

It has been uniformly held that such conduct may indeed constitute such a violation. ( Stern v Harrold, 12…