Summary
holding moot an appeal seeking to challenge the sale of real property after that property is transferred to a bona fide purchaser for value and without first filing a supersedeas bond
Summary of this case from Dauphin v. HennagerOpinion
No. 12730.
Argued January 6, 1969.
Decided January 24, 1969.
Alfred L. Hiss, Arlington, Va., for appellant.
Leroy J. Blackwelder, pro se.
Richard M. Millman, Washington, D.C., for appellee.
John T. Hazel, Jr., Fairfax, Va. (Hazel, Beckhorn Hanes, Fairfax, Va., on brief), for intervenors.
Before HAYNSWORTH, Chief Judge, and BOREMAN and CRAVEN, Circuit Judges.
For failure to comply with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 62(d) the appeal from the order confirming the judicial sale is dismissed as moot.
All other questions presented are simply attempts to relitigate the established law of the case. Sterling v. Blackwelder, 383 F.2d 282 (4th Cir. 1967) and Sterling v. Blackwelder, 387 F.2d 346 (4th Cir. 1967).
Dismissed.