From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Stephens v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia
Feb 9, 1981
278 S.E.2d 70 (Ga. Ct. App. 1981)

Opinion

61289.

DECIDED FEBRUARY 9, 1981.

Drug violation. Bibb Superior Court. Before Judge Culpepper.

G. F. Peterman III, for appellant.

Charles H. Weston, Chief Assistant District Attorney, Thomas J. Mathews, Assistant District Attorney, for appellee.


Willie J. Stephens appeals from his conviction of two counts of violating the Georgia Controlled Substances Act following the denial of his motion for a new trial.

1. In the absence of a timely written request, the trial court did not err in failing to charge the jury that the defendant had a constitutional right not to testify and that no inference could be made as a result of his failure to testify on his own behalf. Woodard v. State, 234 Ga. 901 ( 218 S.E.2d 629) (1975).

2. Assuming arguendo that appellant's objection to the testimony of a witness as to the purpose of undercover agents was properly made, the trial judge did not err in permitting the witness to give reasons, circumstances and conditions surrounding the conduct of the drug investigation. Rozier v. State, 124 Ga. App. 481 ( 184 S.E.2d 203) (1971); Taylor v. State, 135 Ga. 622 (4) ( 70 S.E. 237) (1910); and James v. State, 223 Ga. 677, 684 (7) ( 157 S.E.2d 471) (1967).

Judgment affirmed. Banke and Carley, JJ., concur.


DECIDED FEBRUARY 9, 1981.


Summaries of

Stephens v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia
Feb 9, 1981
278 S.E.2d 70 (Ga. Ct. App. 1981)
Case details for

Stephens v. State

Case Details

Full title:STEPHENS v. THE STATE

Court:Court of Appeals of Georgia

Date published: Feb 9, 1981

Citations

278 S.E.2d 70 (Ga. Ct. App. 1981)
278 S.E.2d 70

Citing Cases

Teague v. State

The Supreme Court does not specify in Carter whether or not a proper request to charge must be in writing,…

Lashley v. State

The fact that the shopping plaza was known by the officers to be an area where illegal drugs were sold had at…