From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Stephens Inst. v. United States ex rel. Rose

Supreme Court of the United States
Apr 1, 2019
139 S. Ct. 1464 (2019)

Summary

holding that post-Escobar, "the four basic elements of a False Claims Act claim, set out in Hendow, remain valid."

Summary of this case from United States v. CH2M Hill Plateau Remediation Co.

Opinion

No. 18–1124.

04-01-2019

STEPHENS INSTITUTE, dba Academy of Art University, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES, ex rel. Scott ROSE, et al.


Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.


Summaries of

Stephens Inst. v. United States ex rel. Rose

Supreme Court of the United States
Apr 1, 2019
139 S. Ct. 1464 (2019)

holding that post-Escobar, "the four basic elements of a False Claims Act claim, set out in Hendow, remain valid."

Summary of this case from United States v. CH2M Hill Plateau Remediation Co.
Case details for

Stephens Inst. v. United States ex rel. Rose

Case Details

Full title:STEPHENS INSTITUTE, dba Academy of Art University, petitioner, v. UNITED…

Court:Supreme Court of the United States

Date published: Apr 1, 2019

Citations

139 S. Ct. 1464 (2019)

Citing Cases

United States v. McKesson Corp.

United States Ex Rel. Rose v. Stephens Inst., 909 F.3d 1012, 1017 (9th Cir. 2018), cert. denied sub nom.…

United States v. CH2M Hill Plateau Remediation Co.

Hendow, 461 F.3d at 1174; United States Ex Rel. Rose v. Stephens Inst., 909 F.3d 1012, 1020 (9th Cir. 2018),…