From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Stephen Merritt Burial and Cremation v. Stephen Merritt

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Mar 23, 1915
108 N.E. 1108 (N.Y. 1915)

Opinion

Argued March 8, 1915

Decided March 23, 1915

Clarence U. Carruth and Charles R. Carruth for appellants.

Richard Ely for respondent.


Judgment modified on the dissenting opinion of INGRAHAM, P.J., below, by striking out all the injunctive provisions thereof except the single provision enjoining the defendant corporation from using the name Stephen Merritt Company in the undertaking business. No costs of this appeal to either party.

Concur: WILLARD BARTLETT, Ch. J., CHASE, HOGAN and MILLER, JJ. Dissenting: HISCOCK and SEABURY, JJ. Not voting: CUDDEBACK, J.


Summaries of

Stephen Merritt Burial and Cremation v. Stephen Merritt

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Mar 23, 1915
108 N.E. 1108 (N.Y. 1915)
Case details for

Stephen Merritt Burial and Cremation v. Stephen Merritt

Case Details

Full title:STEPHEN MERRITT BURIAL AND CREMATION COMPANY, Respondent, v . STEPHEN…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Mar 23, 1915

Citations

108 N.E. 1108 (N.Y. 1915)
108 N.E. 1108

Citing Cases

Westphal v. Westphal's World's Best Corporation

" This court is unanimously of the opinion that the plaintiff is entitled to injunctive relief, but a…

Tierney Sons, Inc., v. Tierney Bros., Inc.

Moreover, as the court pointed out in that case, no additional immunity is derived from the fact that the…