Opinion
Submitted February 16, 1940 —
Decided April 25, 1940.
On appeal from the Supreme Court, whose opinion is reported in 123 N.J.L. 497.
For the appellant, Kellogg Chance.
For the respondent, William T. Cahill.
The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. Justice Perskie in the Supreme Court and reported in 123 N.J.L. 497.
For affirmance — THE CHIEF JUSTICE, CASE, DONGES, HEHER, PORTER, HETFIELD, DEAR, WELLS, WOLFSKEIL, RAFFERTY, HAGUE, JJ. 11.
For reversal — None.