From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Steinmetz v. Snead Co.

Court of Errors and Appeals
Apr 25, 1940
124 N.J.L. 450 (N.J. 1940)

Opinion

Submitted February 16, 1940 —

Decided April 25, 1940.

On appeal from the Supreme Court, whose opinion is reported in 123 N.J.L. 497.

For the appellant, Kellogg Chance.

For the respondent, William T. Cahill.


The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. Justice Perskie in the Supreme Court and reported in 123 N.J.L. 497.

For affirmance — THE CHIEF JUSTICE, CASE, DONGES, HEHER, PORTER, HETFIELD, DEAR, WELLS, WOLFSKEIL, RAFFERTY, HAGUE, JJ. 11.

For reversal — None.


Summaries of

Steinmetz v. Snead Co.

Court of Errors and Appeals
Apr 25, 1940
124 N.J.L. 450 (N.J. 1940)
Case details for

Steinmetz v. Snead Co.

Case Details

Full title:MARGARET STEINMETZ, RESPONDENT, v. SNEAD COMPANY, APPELLANT

Court:Court of Errors and Appeals

Date published: Apr 25, 1940

Citations

124 N.J.L. 450 (N.J. 1940)
12 A.2d 678

Citing Cases

Penn. Mfrs. Casualty Ins. Co. v. Schmerbeck

The occurrence of a compensable accident was admitted. The Supreme Court found as a fact that the contract of…

New Amsterdam Casualty Co. v. Popovich

The respective parties under the Workmen's Compensation Act occupy a definite statutory status or…