From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Steiner v. Pleasantville Constructors

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department
Jun 1, 1944
182 Misc. 66 (N.Y. App. Term 1944)

Opinion

June 1, 1944.

Appeal from the City Court of the City of New York, County of Bronx, SCHACKNO, J.

Bernard Levy for appellant.

Henry Amster for respondent.


MEMORANDUM


Plaintiff is not entitled to recover double time for Sunday work under the provisions of the Fair Labor Standards Act ( U.S. Code, tit. 29, § 201 et seq.). Executive Order No. 9240 (as amd. by Executive Order No. 9248; 7 Fed. Reg. 7419, eff. Oct. 1, 1942; also in note to U.S. Code, Supp. III, tit. 40, § 326) is not binding on the defendant.

The judgment should be modified by reducing the amount thereof to the sum of $1,381.36, with interest and costs, and as modified affirmed, without costs.

SHIENTAG, McLAUGHLIN and HECHT, JJ., concur.

Judgment modified.


Summaries of

Steiner v. Pleasantville Constructors

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department
Jun 1, 1944
182 Misc. 66 (N.Y. App. Term 1944)
Case details for

Steiner v. Pleasantville Constructors

Case Details

Full title:DEWITT W. STEINER, Respondent, v. PLEASANTVILLE CONSTRUCTORS, INC.…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department

Date published: Jun 1, 1944

Citations

182 Misc. 66 (N.Y. App. Term 1944)
49 N.Y.S.2d 42

Citing Cases

Young v. Kellex Corporation

Nor, apparently, is any authority to be found in judicial decisions. Executive Order No. 9240, as amended by…

United States Cartridge Co. v. Powell

c., N.Y.C.Ct. 1947, 73 N.Y.S.2d 428; Ware v. Goodyear Corp.,* D.C. S.D.Ind. 1946, Swettman v. Remington Rand,…