From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Steiner v. Davis

Court of Appeal of California, Fourth District
Jun 10, 1937
21 Cal.App.2d 334 (Cal. Ct. App. 1937)

Opinion

Docket No. 2102.

June 10, 1937.

MOTION to dismiss an appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of San Bernardino County. Benjamin F. Warmer, Judge. Motion denied.

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

C. Arden Gingery and E.W. Miller for Appellant.

Hert Withington for Respondent.


Respondent's notice of motion to dismiss the appeal in this action was filed on May 17, 1937. It was therein stated that the basis for the motion was that appellant had failed to file a record on appeal within the time required by the rules of this court. The motion was noticed for hearing on June 8, 1937. Prior to this date the clerk's transcript and appellant's opening brief were filed with this court. It appears from respondent's notice of motion that the judgment from which the appeal has been taken was rendered after a demurrer to appellant's third and supplemental complaint had been sustained and that no evidence was submitted to the trial court. [1] No record other than that provided by the clerk's transcript now on file will be required for determination of the appeal. The fact that the clerk's transcript was on file at the time respondent's motion for dismissal was presented is a sufficient reason for denying the motion. ( Jaques v. Board of Supervisors, 22 Cal.App. 627 [ 135 P. 686]; Snodgrass v. Hand, 125 Cal.App. 265 [ 13 P.2d 769]; Sampson v. Boysen, 5 Cal.App. (2d) 282 [ 42 P.2d 704].)

The motion to dismiss the appeal is denied.

Barnard, P.J., and Marks, J., concurred.


Summaries of

Steiner v. Davis

Court of Appeal of California, Fourth District
Jun 10, 1937
21 Cal.App.2d 334 (Cal. Ct. App. 1937)
Case details for

Steiner v. Davis

Case Details

Full title:LUNA K. STEINER, Appellant, v. BYRON D. DAVIS, Respondent

Court:Court of Appeal of California, Fourth District

Date published: Jun 10, 1937

Citations

21 Cal.App.2d 334 (Cal. Ct. App. 1937)
69 P.2d 184

Citing Cases

Pulver v. Avco Financial Services

The fact that the clerk's transcript was on file at the time respondent's motion for dismissal was presented…

Murphy v. Krumm

[1a] It is argued that regardless of defendants' delay both in the payment of the fee prescribed for the…