From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Steelform Contracting Co. v. Baldwin Contracting Co.

Court of Appeal of California, First District, Division Three
Oct 31, 1962
209 Cal.App.2d 177 (Cal. Ct. App. 1962)

Summary

concluding an order denying a petition to annul the designation of an arbitrator was not appealable

Summary of this case from Mcelvany, Inc. v. Ahmadi

Opinion

Docket No. 20350.

October 31, 1962.

APPEAL from an order of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco denying petition to annul designation of an arbitrator. Byron Arnold, Judge. Appeal dismissed.

Raymond H. Levy and Truman S. Waterman for Plaintiff and Appellant.

Robert E. Burns, Crimmins, Kent, Bradley Burns and Manwell Manwell for Defendant and Respondent.


At the time of the hearing of oral argument, the court expressed doubt that the order from which the appeal was taken is appealable, and directed counsel for appellant to demonstrate its appealability. Appellant has filed a brief on the subject. [1] We find that the order is not appealable, and we dismiss the appeal on our own motion.

Appellant, one party to an arbitration agreement, petitioned the superior court to annul the designation of an arbitrator selected by the other party to the agreement, or to require that said other party withdraw its designation and substitute another, upon the ground that the arbitrator selected is a stockholder and employee of the other party and a witness to the matters which are to be arbitrated. The court denied the petition. The petition does not allege refusal of the other party to arbitrate, but relates to the qualifications of one of the three arbitrators provided for in the contract.

Section 1294 of the Code of Civil Procedure provides for appeals from judgments entered upon arbitration and from four classes of orders in arbitration proceedings. The order made herein is not one of these, although perhaps it will be reviewable after judgment under section 1294.2 of the Code of Civil Procedure. An order denying a petition to compel arbitration is appealable (Code Civ. Proc., § 1294, subd. (a)), but this is not such an order.

The appeal is dismissed.

Draper, P.J., and Salsman, J., concurred.

Appellant's petition for a hearing by the Supreme Court was denied December 26, 1962.


Summaries of

Steelform Contracting Co. v. Baldwin Contracting Co.

Court of Appeal of California, First District, Division Three
Oct 31, 1962
209 Cal.App.2d 177 (Cal. Ct. App. 1962)

concluding an order denying a petition to annul the designation of an arbitrator was not appealable

Summary of this case from Mcelvany, Inc. v. Ahmadi
Case details for

Steelform Contracting Co. v. Baldwin Contracting Co.

Case Details

Full title:STEELFORM CONTRACTING COMPANY, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. BALDWIN…

Court:Court of Appeal of California, First District, Division Three

Date published: Oct 31, 1962

Citations

209 Cal.App.2d 177 (Cal. Ct. App. 1962)
25 Cal. Rptr. 916

Citing Cases

Andrews v. Joint Clerks Etc. Committee

[12] Even if the complaint and petition were considered as confined to seeking the above relief under the…

Mcelvany, Inc. v. Ahmadi

They do not include an order denying disqualification of an arbitrator. (§ 1294; see Steelform Contracting…