From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Steckal v. Haughton Elevator Co.

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Apr 26, 1983
59 N.Y.2d 628 (N.Y. 1983)

Opinion

Argued March 21, 1983

Decided April 26, 1983

Appeal from the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the Second Judicial Department, ROGER J. MINER, J.

Frederic Block for appellant. Reid A. Curtis and Wade T. Dempsey for respondents.


MEMORANDUM.

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed with costs.

Although the words "strictly liable" appear in plaintiff's complaint, there was no request to charge on such a theory nor was plaintiff's motion for a directed verdict made on any such ground. Moreover, there is no proof that the elevator was defective when it left defendants' hands, an essential of a strict liability cause of action. That defendants both supplied the elevator and serviced it after installation would not impose upon them strict liability for a defect which developed after installation was completed.

Nor is plaintiff's case helped by the 1975 amendment to section 2-318 of the Uniform Commercial Code, if its applicability be assumed, there being no evidence in this record that the delivery of the elevator occurred after the effective date of that amendment ( Fisher v Graco, Inc., 81 A.D.2d 209, 211, app withdrawn 54 N.Y.2d 1027).

Chief Judge COOKE and Judges JASEN, JONES, WACHTLER, FUCHSBERG, MEYER and SIMONS concur.

Order affirmed, with costs, in a memorandum.


Summaries of

Steckal v. Haughton Elevator Co.

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Apr 26, 1983
59 N.Y.2d 628 (N.Y. 1983)
Case details for

Steckal v. Haughton Elevator Co.

Case Details

Full title:DOROTHY STECKAL, Appellant, v. HAUGHTON ELEVATOR CO., INC., et al.…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Apr 26, 1983

Citations

59 N.Y.2d 628 (N.Y. 1983)
463 N.Y.S.2d 186
449 N.E.2d 1264

Citing Cases

Booth v. Otis Elevator Co.

In opposition, plaintiff failed to raise a triable issue of fact. Crediting the testimony of plaintiff's…

Booth v. Otis Elevator Co.

In opposition, plaintiff failed to raise a triable issue of fact. Crediting the testimony of plaintiff's…