From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Statt v. American Home Assurance Company

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Mar 12, 1993
191 A.D.2d 962 (N.Y. App. Div. 1993)

Opinion

March 12, 1993

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Monroe County, Calvaruso, J.

Present — Denman, P.J., Green, Balio, Doerr and Boehm, JJ.


Judgment unanimously modified on the law and as modified affirmed without costs in accordance with the following Memorandum: This declaratory judgment action is premature. The extent of defendant American Home Assurance Company's (Home) duty to indemnify must necessarily depend on the resolution of an issue that, if it arises, will be decided in the underlying action (see, Hout v. Coffman, 126 A.D.2d 973; Allstate Ins. Co. v Santiago, 98 A.D.2d 608). Thus, the complaint against Home must be dismissed.

Supreme Court did not abuse its discretion in denying Home's application for an award of costs, disbursements and attorney's fees.


Summaries of

Statt v. American Home Assurance Company

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Mar 12, 1993
191 A.D.2d 962 (N.Y. App. Div. 1993)
Case details for

Statt v. American Home Assurance Company

Case Details

Full title:ROSEMARY T. STATT, Appellant-Respondent, v. AMERICAN HOME ASSURANCE…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Mar 12, 1993

Citations

191 A.D.2d 962 (N.Y. App. Div. 1993)
595 N.Y.S.2d 700

Citing Cases

Rojas v. Romanoff

Defendants' rights to be defended and indemnified by Nationwide remained intact regardless of the outcome of…

Am. Home Assur. Co. v. McDonald

Defendant Randy Kamhi cross-moves for an order directing American Home to comply with her outstanding…