From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Zurawski

Supreme Court of New Jersey
May 9, 1966
219 A.2d 614 (N.J. 1966)

Opinion

Argued April 25, 1966 —

Decided May 9, 1966.

On appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court, Appellate Division.

Mr. Hyman Isaac argued the cause for the appellant ( Mr. Barry Epstein, on the brief; Messrs. Reibel, Isaac Tannenbaum, attorneys).

Mr. Joseph A. Hoffman argued the cause for the respondent ( Mr. Arthur J. Sills, Attorney General, attorney.)


The judgment is affirmed for the reasons expressed in the opinion of Judge Brown in the Appellate Division.

For affirmance — Chief Justice WEINTRAUB and Justices JACOBS, FRANCIS, PROCTOR, HALL and SCHETTINO. — 6.

For reversal — None.


Summaries of

State v. Zurawski

Supreme Court of New Jersey
May 9, 1966
219 A.2d 614 (N.J. 1966)
Case details for

State v. Zurawski

Case Details

Full title:STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. MERDIE ZURAWSKI…

Court:Supreme Court of New Jersey

Date published: May 9, 1966

Citations

219 A.2d 614 (N.J. 1966)
219 A.2d 614

Citing Cases

State v. Williams

Two Appellate Division decisions upholding warrantless searches of taverns are distinguishable. State v.…

United States ex Rel. Hart v. Davenport

See N.J.Stat.Ann. § 33:1-35 governing inspection of premises licensed to dispense alcoholic beverages. Cf.…