State v. Zeek

Full title: STATE OF NEW JERSEY, DEFENDANT IN ERROR, v. CHARLES ZEEK, PLAINTIFF IN…

Court: Court of Errors and Appeals

Date published: Jan 13, 1939

3 A.2d 574 (N.J. 1939)

3 A.2d 574

Opinion

Argued October 19, 1938 —

Decided January 13, 1939.

On error to the Supreme Court, whose opinion is reported in 120 N.J.L. 322.

For the defendant in error, Orville V. Meslar.

For the plaintiff in error, J. Bernard Saltzman.

PER CURIAM.

The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion per curiam in the Supreme Court.

For affirmance — CASE, DONGES, HEHER, PERSKIE, PORTER, HETFIELD, DEAR, WELLS, WOLFSKEIL, RAFFERTY, WALKER, JJ. 11.

For reversal — None.