From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Young

Oregon Court of Appeals
Dec 18, 1991
834 P.2d 1040 (Or. Ct. App. 1991)

Opinion

88-1315, 88-1316; CA A62227

Submitted In Banc February 5, 1992

On respondents — cross-appellants petition for reconsideration filed December 18, 1991 Of opinion filed July 24 ( 108 Or. App. 196, 816 P.2d 612) Petition for reconsideration denied July 8, 1992 Petition for review denied September 29, 1992 ( 314 Or. 392)

In Banc

Appeal from Circuit Court, Columbia County.

Thomas E. Edison, Judge.

Forest N. Rieke, Leland R. Berger, Jon P. Martz and Rieke, Geil Savage, P.C., Portland, for petition.


Petition for reconsideration denied.

Warren, J., dissenting.


I would grant the petition for reconsideration for the reasons stated in my special concurrence opinion in State v. Worsham, 114 Or. App. 170, 834 P.2d 1033 (1992). Joseph, C.J., and Rossman, J., join in this dissent.


Summaries of

State v. Young

Oregon Court of Appeals
Dec 18, 1991
834 P.2d 1040 (Or. Ct. App. 1991)
Case details for

State v. Young

Case Details

Full title:STATE OF OREGON, Appellant — Cross-Respondent, v. ANGELA E. YOUNG…

Court:Oregon Court of Appeals

Date published: Dec 18, 1991

Citations

834 P.2d 1040 (Or. Ct. App. 1991)
834 P.2d 1040

Citing Cases

State v. Milks

The state first challenges the trial court's conclusion that the informant was not reliable. Most of the…