From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Wilmoth

Missouri Court of Appeals, Springfield District
Feb 28, 1975
520 S.W.2d 185 (Mo. Ct. App. 1975)

Opinion

No. 9937.

February 28, 1975.

APPEAL FROM THE DUNKLIN COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT, FLAKE L. McHANEY, J.

John C. Danforth, Atty. Gen., K. Preston Dean, II, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.

Paul W. Seabaugh, Kennett, for appellant.


Appellant has purported to appeal from the trial court's revocation of his probation.

Appellant's jurisdictional statement states: "Appellant pleaded guilty of tampering with a trailer, a felony .... Imposition of sentence was suspended and defendant was placed on supervised probation. During his probationary period, defendant was arrested and charged with first degree burglary. The Court held a hearing and revoked defendant's probation and sentenced defendant. This appeal is to contest the correctness of the Court's revocation order."

The right of appeal is statutory [Rule 81.01, V.A.M.R.], and § 549.141, RSMo 1969, V.A.M.S., bars our review by direct appeal of the revocation of appellant's probation. State v. Camden, 514 S.W.2d 181 (Mo.App. 1974).

Determining, sua sponte, that we have no appellate jurisdiction, appellant's appeal is dismissed.

All concur.


Summaries of

State v. Wilmoth

Missouri Court of Appeals, Springfield District
Feb 28, 1975
520 S.W.2d 185 (Mo. Ct. App. 1975)
Case details for

State v. Wilmoth

Case Details

Full title:STATE OF MISSOURI, RESPONDENT, v. VICTOR LaVAUGHN WILMOTH, APPELLANT

Court:Missouri Court of Appeals, Springfield District

Date published: Feb 28, 1975

Citations

520 S.W.2d 185 (Mo. Ct. App. 1975)

Citing Cases

State v. Champion

The right of appeal is statutory in this state and § 549.141, RSMo 1969, bars our review by direct appeal of…