From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Williams

Supreme Court of Louisiana
Feb 26, 1987
502 So. 2d 1388 (La. 1987)

Opinion

No. 86-KA-1961.

February 26, 1987.

APPEAL FROM CRIMINAL DISTRICT COURT, PARISH OF ORLEANS, STATE OF LOUISIANA, HONORABLE MIRIAM WALTZER, J.

William J. Guste, Jr., Atty. Gen., Harry F. Connick, Dist. Atty., Michael McMahon, Rockne Moseley, Asst. Dist. Attys., for plaintiff-appellant.

Clyde Darrow Merritt, New Orleans, for defendant-appellee.


The ruling of the trial court granting defendant's motion to quash is vacated, and this case is remanded for all further proceedings in accord with the law. The failure of the legislature to provide a "cleansing period" limiting the use of prior convictions for the same offense in recidivist prosecutions under R.S. 40:966(D), does not deprive the accused of due process or the equal protection of the law. See, State v. Forrest, 439 So.2d 404 (La. 1983).

JUDGMENT REVERSED; CASE REMANDED.


Summaries of

State v. Williams

Supreme Court of Louisiana
Feb 26, 1987
502 So. 2d 1388 (La. 1987)
Case details for

State v. Williams

Case Details

Full title:STATE OF LOUISIANA v. NATHANIEL WILLIAMS

Court:Supreme Court of Louisiana

Date published: Feb 26, 1987

Citations

502 So. 2d 1388 (La. 1987)

Citing Cases

State v. Rolen

Due process does not require them and several Louisiana repeat offender statutes do not have them.See State…

State v. Ignot

Due process does not require them and several Louisiana repeat offender statutes do not have them. See State…