From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Williams

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Court of Appeals
Dec 9, 2011
Unpublished Opinion No. 2011-UP-551 (S.C. Ct. App. Dec. 9, 2011)

Opinion

Unpublished Opinion No. 2011-UP-551

12-09-2011

The State, Respondent, v. Michael O. Williams, Appellant.

Appellate Defender Elizabeth A. Franklin-Best, of Columbia, for Appellant. Attorney General Alan Wilson, Chief Deputy Attorney General John W. McIntosh, Assistant Deputy Attorney General Salley W. Elliott, Assistant Attorney General Mark Farthing, and Solicitor Daniel E. Johnson, all of Columbia, for Respondent.


THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

Appeal From Richland County

G. Thomas Cooper, Jr., Circuit Court Judge


AFFIRMED

Appellate Defender Elizabeth A. Franklin-Best, of Columbia, for Appellant.

Attorney General Alan Wilson, Chief Deputy Attorney General John W. McIntosh, Assistant Deputy Attorney General Salley W. Elliott, Assistant Attorney General Mark Farthing, and Solicitor Daniel E. Johnson, all of Columbia, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM : Michael O. Williams was convicted of voluntary manslaughter and use of a firearm during the commission of a violent crime. Williams appeals, arguing the trial court erred in admitting his statement, which was obtained in violation of Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436 (1966). We affirm pursuant to Rule 220(b)(1), SCACR, and the following authorities: State v. Dunbar, 356 S.C. 138, 142, 587 S.E.2d 691, 693 (2003) ("In order for an issue to be preserved for appellate review, it must have been raised to and ruled upon by the trial judge."); State v. Forrester, 343 S.C. 637, 642, 541 S.E.2d 837, 840 (2001) (stating a motion inlimine to exclude evidence prior to trial will not preserve an issue for appellate review without a contemporaneous objection when the evidence is introduced).

We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.

AFFIRMED.

HUFF, PIEPER, and LOCKEMY, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

State v. Williams

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Court of Appeals
Dec 9, 2011
Unpublished Opinion No. 2011-UP-551 (S.C. Ct. App. Dec. 9, 2011)
Case details for

State v. Williams

Case Details

Full title:The State, Respondent, v. Michael O. Williams, Appellant.

Court:THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Court of Appeals

Date published: Dec 9, 2011

Citations

Unpublished Opinion No. 2011-UP-551 (S.C. Ct. App. Dec. 9, 2011)