From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Williams

Court of Appeals of Wisconsin.
Dec 10, 2013
2014 WI App. 16 (Wis. Ct. App. 2013)

Summary

holding Graham inapplicable to homicide cases and Miller only applicable to sentences of mandatory life without parole

Summary of this case from State v. Springer

Opinion

No. 2012AP2399.

2013-12-10

STATE of Wisconsin, Plaintiff–Respondent, v. James Dontae WILLIAMS, Defendant–Appellant.

Id., 560 U.S. at 82. In reaching that decision, the Court discussed prior case law and scientific research suggesting that juveniles lack the same maturity as adults and that there are “fundamental differences between juvenile and adult minds.” See id. at 68.



Summaries of

State v. Williams

Court of Appeals of Wisconsin.
Dec 10, 2013
2014 WI App. 16 (Wis. Ct. App. 2013)

holding Graham inapplicable to homicide cases and Miller only applicable to sentences of mandatory life without parole

Summary of this case from State v. Springer

finding Miller did not apply when parole was possible

Summary of this case from State v. Gulley
Case details for

State v. Williams

Case Details

Full title:STATE of Wisconsin, Plaintiff–Respondent, v. James Dontae WILLIAMS…

Court:Court of Appeals of Wisconsin.

Date published: Dec 10, 2013

Citations

2014 WI App. 16 (Wis. Ct. App. 2013)
352 Wis. 2d 573
842 N.W.2d 536

Citing Cases

Williams v. State

See United States v. Sparks , 941 F.3d 748, 753-54 (5th Cir. 2019), cert. denied , ––– U.S. ––––, 140 S. Ct.…

State v. Springer

The State urges us to join other jurisdictions that have held that Graham and Miller do not extend to de…