From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Wilkes

Supreme Court of North Carolina.
Oct 4, 2013
367 N.C. 116 (N.C. 2013)

Opinion

No. 80A13.

2013-10-4

STATE of North Carolina v. Timothy Charles WILKES.

Roy Cooper, Attorney General, by Creecy C. Johnson, Assistant Attorney General, for the State. Duncan B. McCormick, Lillington, for defendant-appellant.


Appeal pursuant to N.C.G.S. § 7A–30(2) from the decision of a divided panel of the Court of Appeals, ––– N.C.App. ––––, 736 S.E.2d 582 (2013), finding no error at a trial that resulted in judgments entered on 16 June 2011 by Judge V. Bradford Long in Superior Court, Moore County, but remanding for resentencing. Heard in the Supreme Court on 5 September 2013. Roy Cooper, Attorney General, by Creecy C. Johnson, Assistant Attorney General, for the State. Duncan B. McCormick, Lillington, for defendant-appellant.
PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.


Summaries of

State v. Wilkes

Supreme Court of North Carolina.
Oct 4, 2013
367 N.C. 116 (N.C. 2013)
Case details for

State v. Wilkes

Case Details

Full title:STATE of North Carolina v. Timothy Charles WILKES.

Court:Supreme Court of North Carolina.

Date published: Oct 4, 2013

Citations

367 N.C. 116 (N.C. 2013)
748 S.E.2d 146

Citing Cases

State v. Harding

In State v. Wilkes , we applied the Rambert Court's separate-and-distinct-act analysis in the assault…