From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Wilkes

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Five
Apr 25, 2000
16 S.W.3d 727 (Mo. Ct. App. 2000)

Opinion

No. ED76487.

April 25, 2000.

APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF ST. LOUIS COUNTY, HONORABLE B.C. DRUMM.

Irene Karns, 3402 Buttonwood, Columbia, MO 65201-3722, for appellant.

Jeremiah W. (JAY) Nixon, Andrea L. Mazza, P.O. Box 899, Jefferson City, MO 65102, for respondent.

Before Mary Rhodes Russell, C.J., Lawrence G. Crahan, J., and Charles Blackmar, Sr.J.



ORDER


Larry Wilkes ("Defendant") appeals the judgment entered upon his conviction by a jury of tampering in the first degree pursuant to section 569.080.1(2) RSMo 1994. Defendant claims the trial court erred in overruling his Batson objection to the State's preemptory strike of a venireperson and that the trial court erred and abused its discretion in allowing the prosecutor to pose a hypothetical during voir dire examination.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. An extended opinion would be of no precedential value. We have, however, provided the parties with a brief memorandum opinion, for their use only, explaining the reason for our decision. The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).


Summaries of

State v. Wilkes

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Five
Apr 25, 2000
16 S.W.3d 727 (Mo. Ct. App. 2000)
Case details for

State v. Wilkes

Case Details

Full title:STATE OF MISSOURI, Respondent, v. LARRY WILKES, Appellant

Court:Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Five

Date published: Apr 25, 2000

Citations

16 S.W.3d 727 (Mo. Ct. App. 2000)

Citing Cases

Wilkes v. Luebbers

Exh. A at 50-51). Petitioner appealed the judgment, and on April 25, 2000, petitioner's conviction and…