From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Wetmore

Supreme Court of North Carolina
Sep 1, 1977
248 S.E.2d 338 (N.C. 1977)

Opinion

No. 94

Filed 12 September 1977.


ORDER FOR NEW TRIAL UPON REMAND FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES

HAVING reconsidered this case on remand from the Supreme Court of the United States in the light of Mullaney v. Wilbur, 421 U.S. 684, 44 L.Ed.2d 508 (1975), and Hankerson v. North Carolina, ___ U.S. ___, 53 L.Ed.2d 306 (1977), the defendant having properly raised on appeal to this Court the question of the constitutionality of the trial judge's instructions placing the burden on the defendant to show that the killing was done in the heat of a sudden passion, see State v. Wetmore, 287 N.C. 344 (1975), and being of the opinion that in light of Mullaney and Hankerson, these assignments of error should have been sustained and defendant awarded a new trial, now, therefore, it is

ORDERED by the Court in Conference that defendant be and he is hereby awarded a new trial.

This the 12th day of September, 1977.

James G. Exum, Jr. Associate Justice For the Court


Summaries of

State v. Wetmore

Supreme Court of North Carolina
Sep 1, 1977
248 S.E.2d 338 (N.C. 1977)
Case details for

State v. Wetmore

Case Details

Full title:STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA v. ROGER LAWRENCE WETMORE

Court:Supreme Court of North Carolina

Date published: Sep 1, 1977

Citations

248 S.E.2d 338 (N.C. 1977)
248 S.E.2d 338

Citing Cases

Young v. Sams

Therefore, it cannot be found that petitioner's counsel acted outside the range of competence demanded of…

State v. Wetmore

This Court on 12 September 1977, having reconsidered the case in light of Mullaney v. Wilbur, 421 U.S. 684…