From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. West

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District
Mar 21, 2006
186 S.W.3d 488 (Mo. Ct. App. 2006)

Opinion

No. ED 85910.

March 21, 2006.

Appeal from the Circuit Court of St. Louis County, Colleen Dolan, Judge.

Amy M. Bartholow, Columbia, MO, for appellant.

Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Karen L. Kramer, Jefferson City, MO, for respondent.

Before MARY K. HOFF, P.J., CLIFFORD H. AHRENS, J., and PATRICIA L. COHEN, J.


ORDER


Christopher Q. West ("defendant") appeals the judgment on his conviction of attempted first degree robbery, first degree assault, and armed criminal action. Defendant claims the trial court abused its discretion in overruling his motion for a continuance because of the State's late disclosure of palm print evidence. Defendant also claims the trial court abused its discretion in overruling his motion to suppress identification and overruling his objection to a witness's identification of him in a photo lineup. Finally, defendant claims the trial court erred in admitting into evidence certain testimony at trial.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed in accordance with Rule 30.25(b).


Summaries of

State v. West

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District
Mar 21, 2006
186 S.W.3d 488 (Mo. Ct. App. 2006)
Case details for

State v. West

Case Details

Full title:STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Christopher Q. WEST, Appellant

Court:Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District

Date published: Mar 21, 2006

Citations

186 S.W.3d 488 (Mo. Ct. App. 2006)

Citing Cases

West v. State

A police investigation led to the identification, arrest and prosecution of Movant and Fulton. A jury found…

West v. Dormire

(Id. at 66-73.) On November 23, 2005, petitioner appealed his conviction, arguing that the trial court erred…