From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Wells

The Court of Appeals of Washington, Division One
Oct 6, 2003
118 Wn. App. 1061 (Wash. Ct. App. 2003)
Download
PDF
Check
Treatment

Summary

In State v Wells, noted at 118 Wn. App. 1061, 2003 WL 22286178, 2003 Wash. App. LEXIS 2284, the very same prosecutor made the very same "benefit of the doubt" argument; however, the defendant neither objected nor sought a curative instruction.

Summary of this case from State v. Warren
See 1 Summary

Opinion

No. 51186-6-I.

October 6, 2003.

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for King County, No. 02-1-03674-7, Steven G. Scott, J., entered September 27, 2002.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Summaries of

State v. Wells

The Court of Appeals of Washington, Division One
Oct 6, 2003
118 Wn. App. 1061 (Wash. Ct. App. 2003)

In State v Wells, noted at 118 Wn. App. 1061, 2003 WL 22286178, 2003 Wash. App. LEXIS 2284, the very same prosecutor made the very same "benefit of the doubt" argument; however, the defendant neither objected nor sought a curative instruction.

Summary of this case from State v. Warren
Case details for

State v. Wells

Case Details

Full title:THE STATE OF WASHINGTON, Respondent, v. CURTIS NEAL WELLS, Appellant

Court:The Court of Appeals of Washington, Division One

Date published: Oct 6, 2003

Citations

118 Wn. App. 1061 (Wash. Ct. App. 2003)
118 Wash. App. 1061

Citing Cases

State v. Warren

We take judicial notice that, indeed, the same prosecutor made similar arguments before. In State v Wells,…

1 Citing Cases