From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Webster

Oregon Court of Appeals
Dec 15, 2010
239 Or. App. 598 (Or. Ct. App. 2010)

Opinion

Nos. CR0811685; A140440.

Submitted November 5, 2010.

December 15, 2010.

Appeal from the Clackamas County Circuit Court Douglas V. Van Dyk, Judge.

Peter Gartlan, Chief Defender, and Irene B. Taylor, Deputy Public Defender, Office of Public Defense Services, filed the brief for appellant.

John R. Kroger, Attorney General, Mary H. Williams, Solicitor General, and Cecil A. Reniche-Smith, Assistant Attorney General, filed the brief for respondent.

Before Schuman, Presiding Judge, and Wollheim, Judge, and Rosenblum, Judge.


PER CURIAM

Reversed and remanded.


Following a trial to the court on stipulated facts, defendant was convicted of driving while suspended. ORS 811.182. He appeals and asserts, among other things, that the trial court erred when it held a bench trial in the absence of a written waiver of his right to a jury trial. Although defendant did not preserve the asserted error before the trial court, he contends that we should review it as plain error. Because the record contains no written waiver or any other indication that defendant executed such a waiver, the state concedes that the trial court committed plain error. See Or Const. Art I, § 11; State v. Barber, 343 Or. 525, 173 P.3d 827 (2007) (reversing as plain error a conviction based on a stipulated facts trial conducted by the court without a written waiver of the defendant's right to jury trial). We agree and, for the reasons set forth in Barber, exercise our discretion to correct the error. Accordingly, defendant's conviction must be reversed and the case remanded for a new trial.

Reversed and remanded.


Summaries of

State v. Webster

Oregon Court of Appeals
Dec 15, 2010
239 Or. App. 598 (Or. Ct. App. 2010)
Case details for

State v. Webster

Case Details

Full title:STATE OF OREGON, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. BRENT EVAN WEBSTER…

Court:Oregon Court of Appeals

Date published: Dec 15, 2010

Citations

239 Or. App. 598 (Or. Ct. App. 2010)
245 P.3d 172

Citing Cases

State v. Herrington

The remedy for the error is reversal of the conviction and remand. State v. Webster , 239 Or.App. 598, 599,…