From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Warren

STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Court of Appeals
Jul 15, 2015
Appellate Case No. 2013-002251 (S.C. Ct. App. Jul. 15, 2015)

Opinion

Appellate Case No. 2013-002251 Unpublished Opinion No. 2015-UP-349

07-15-2015

The State, Respondent, v. Ray Charles Warren, Appellant.

Appellate Defender Lara Mary Caudy, of Columbia, for Appellant. Attorney General Alan McCrory Wilson and Assistant Attorney General Christina Catoe Bigelow, both of Columbia; and Solicitor William Walter Wilkins, III, of Greenville, for Respondent.


THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR. Appeal From Greenville County
Robin B. Stilwell, Circuit Court Judge

AFFIRMED

Appellate Defender Lara Mary Caudy, of Columbia, for Appellant. Attorney General Alan McCrory Wilson and Assistant Attorney General Christina Catoe Bigelow, both of Columbia; and Solicitor William Walter Wilkins, III, of Greenville, for Respondent. PER CURIAM : Affirmed pursuant to Rule 220(b), SCACR, and the following authorities: State v. Forrester, 343 S.C. 637, 642, 541 S.E.2d 837, 840 (2001) ("In most cases, [m]aking a motion in limine to exclude evidence at the beginning of trial does not preserve an issue for review because a motion in limine is not a final determination. The moving party, therefore, must make a contemporaneous objection when the evidence is introduced." (alteration in original) (internal quotation marks omitted)); State v. Dicapua, 373 S.C. 452, 455, 646 S.E.2d 150, 152 (Ct. App. 2007) (holding when a party affirmatively states it has no objection to evidence being admitted at trial, it has waived any previous objections made in a pretrial motion), aff'd, 383 S.C. 394, 680 S.E.2d 292 (2009); State v. Norris, 253 S.C. 31, 40, 168 S.E.2d 564, 568 (1969) (holding an objection "came too late because it was made after the objectionable evidence had been admitted"). AFFIRMED. FEW, C.J., and HUFF and WILLIAMS, JJ., concur.

We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR. --------


Summaries of

State v. Warren

STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Court of Appeals
Jul 15, 2015
Appellate Case No. 2013-002251 (S.C. Ct. App. Jul. 15, 2015)
Case details for

State v. Warren

Case Details

Full title:The State, Respondent, v. Ray Charles Warren, Appellant.

Court:STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Court of Appeals

Date published: Jul 15, 2015

Citations

Appellate Case No. 2013-002251 (S.C. Ct. App. Jul. 15, 2015)