Opinion
Submitted October 26, 1928 —
Decided May 20, 1929.
On error to the Supreme Court, whose per curiam is printed in 6 N.J. Mis. R. 713.
For the defendant in error, Joseph L. Smith.
For the plaintiff in error, Harold Simandl.
The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by the Supreme Court.
For affirmance — THE CHANCELLOR, TRENCHARD, PARKER, KALISCH, CAMPBELL, WHITE, VAN BUSKIRK, McGLENNON, KAYS, HETFIELD, DEAR, JJ. 11.
For reversal — None.