From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Veney

Supreme Court of Ohio
Jun 20, 2007
2007 Ohio 2904 (Ohio 2007)

Opinion

No. 2007-0656.

June 20, 2007.

Appeal from the Franklin App. No. 06AP-523, 2007-Ohio-1295.


Motion and Procedural Rulings.

On review of order certifying a conflict. The court determines that a conflict exists. The parties are to brief the issue stated in the court of appeals' Journal Entry filed March 22, 2007:

"Whether a trial court must strictly comply with the requirement in Crim.R. 11(C) that it inform the defendant that by entering a plea, the defendant waives the right to have the state prove guilt beyond a reasonable doubt."

The conflict cases are State v. Scott (1996), 113 Ohio App.3d 401, State v. Cogar (Oct. 20, 1993), Summit App. No. CA-16234, and State v. Shinkle (Aug. 18, 1998), Scioto App. No. 98CA2560.

Sua sponte, cause consolidated with 2007-0657, State v. Veney, Franklin App. No. 06AP-523, 2007-Ohio-1295.


Summaries of

State v. Veney

Supreme Court of Ohio
Jun 20, 2007
2007 Ohio 2904 (Ohio 2007)
Case details for

State v. Veney

Case Details

Full title:State v. Veney

Court:Supreme Court of Ohio

Date published: Jun 20, 2007

Citations

2007 Ohio 2904 (Ohio 2007)
114 Ohio St. 3d 1423

Citing Cases

State v. Veney

R. 11(C) that it inform the defendant that by entering a plea, the defendant waives the right to have the…