From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Turk

Supreme Court of Ohio
Mar 6, 1935
194 N.E. 453 (Ohio 1935)

Opinion

No. 24919

Decided March 6, 1935.

Supreme Court — Affirmances — Judges equally divided — Criminal law — First degree murder while perpetrating arson — Proof of purpose and intent to kill, necessary — Court of Appeals may modify verdict, when.

ERROR to the Court of Appeals of Cuyahoga county.

Mr. Frank T. Cullitan, prosecuting attorney, and Mr. Thomas A. Burke, Jr., for plaintiff in error.

Mr. Frank G. Jones, for defendant in error.



On consideration whereof Stephenson, Jones and Matthias, JJ., reach the conclusion that no prejudicial error has intervened, and that the judgment of the Court of Appeals should be affirmed on authority of Robbins v. State, 8 Ohio St. 131. Weygandt, C.J., Day and Zimmerman, JJ., are of the opinion that the judgment of the Court of Appeals should be reversed and the judgment of the Court of Common Pleas affirmed. Williams, J., having sat by designation as a member of the Court of Appeals that heard and decided this case, and whose record is now before this court for consideration, does not participate. The court being thus equally divided in opinion as to the merits of the case, the entry of this fact constitutes an affirmance of the judgment of the Court of Appeals.

Judgment affirmed.

STEPHENSON, JONES and MATTHIAS, JJ., concur.

WILLIAMS, J., not participating.


Summaries of

State v. Turk

Supreme Court of Ohio
Mar 6, 1935
194 N.E. 453 (Ohio 1935)
Case details for

State v. Turk

Case Details

Full title:THE STATE OF OHIO v. TURK

Court:Supreme Court of Ohio

Date published: Mar 6, 1935

Citations

194 N.E. 453 (Ohio 1935)
194 N.E. 453

Citing Cases

State v. Farmer

We have gone at length into this analysis of the history and origin of the language now found in Section…

Jordon v. United States

The word "purposely," we take to mean, with design or intentionally. The Supreme Court of Ohio, where the…