From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Thompson

Supreme Court of North Dakota
Jan 12, 2010
2010 N.D. 10 (N.D. 2010)

Summary

holding that victim's testimony as recipient of messages as to knowledge of defendant's phone number and circumstances of the day they were sent was sufficient to authenticate the messages and collecting similar out-of-state and federal cases

Summary of this case from State v. Giacomantonio

Opinion

No. 20090117.

January 12, 2010.

Appeal from the District Court, Walsh County, Northeast Judicial District, M. Richard Geiger, J.

Kelley Marie Riley Cole (argued), Assistant State's Attorney, Grafton, N.D., for plaintiff and appellee.

Blake Dylan Hankey (argued), Grand Forks, N.D., for defendant and appellant.



Summaries of

State v. Thompson

Supreme Court of North Dakota
Jan 12, 2010
2010 N.D. 10 (N.D. 2010)

holding that victim's testimony as recipient of messages as to knowledge of defendant's phone number and circumstances of the day they were sent was sufficient to authenticate the messages and collecting similar out-of-state and federal cases

Summary of this case from State v. Giacomantonio

holding that evidence that recipient of threatening text messages was familiar with the defendant's phone number and distinctive electronic signature was sufficient to authenticate messages as having been sent by the defendant

Summary of this case from Griffin v. State

providing a comprehensive review of other jurisdictions' authenticity requirements for electronic communications

Summary of this case from State v. Koch

providing a comprehensive review of other jurisdictions' authenticity requirements for electronic communications

Summary of this case from Smith v. Smith

providing a comprehensive review of other jurisdictions' authenticity requirements for electronic communications

Summary of this case from Culp v. State
Case details for

State v. Thompson

Case Details

Full title:STATE of North Dakota, Plaintiff and Appellee v. Jennifer Jean Sandvig…

Court:Supreme Court of North Dakota

Date published: Jan 12, 2010

Citations

2010 N.D. 10 (N.D. 2010)
2010 N.D. 10

Citing Cases

People v. Chromik

We do not find, and the parties fail to identify, any Illinois case law concerning the admission of text…

State v. Tresenriter

On appeal, Tresenriter contends there was not sufficient foundation to admit the DNA results because “the…