Opinion
S15G1293 S15G1307
07-05-2016
State of Georgia, et al. v. Sun States Insurance Group, Inc. ; and vice versa.
Isaac Byrd, Deputy Attorney General, Samuel S. Olens, Attorney General, Daniel Stephen Walsh, Senior Assistant Attorney General, Jeffrey William Stump, Assistant Attorney General, for State of Georgia. Thomas J. Gallo, Lora Rachel Lerman, Brian Casey, Barnes & Thornburg LLP, for Sun States Insurance Group. Richard L. Robbins, Alexander F. Denton, Alexa R. Ross, Robbins Ross Alloy Belinfante Littlefiend, for Regulatory Technologies.
Isaac Byrd, Deputy Attorney General, Samuel S. Olens, Attorney General, Daniel Stephen Walsh, Senior Assistant Attorney General, Jeffrey William Stump, Assistant Attorney General, for State of Georgia.
Thomas J. Gallo, Lora Rachel Lerman, Brian Casey, Barnes & Thornburg LLP, for Sun States Insurance Group.
Richard L. Robbins, Alexander F. Denton, Alexa R. Ross, Robbins Ross Alloy Belinfante Littlefiend, for Regulatory Technologies.
HINES, Presiding Justice. This Court granted a writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals in State of Ga. v. Sun States Ins. Grp ., 332 Ga.App. 197, 770 S.E.2d 43 (2015), litigation involving the liquidation of an insurance company, International Indemnity Company (“IIC”), pursuant to the Insurers Rehabilitation and Liquidation Act (the “Act”) and attempts by IIC's sole shareholder, Sun States Insurance Group, Inc. (“Sun States”), to get monetary relief from the State of Georgia as liquidator (“State/liquidator”) and its agents, including Regulatory Technologies, Inc. (“Reg Tech”), which assisted in the liquidation of IIC. Sun States sought, inter alia, monies, it characterized as a “surcharge,” which allegedly were wrongfully taken out of the IIC estate. The State/liquidator unsuccessfully moved to dismiss Sun State's claims against it, asserting that they were claims for a money judgment against the State, and thus, barred by the doctrine of sovereign immunity. It then filed a direct appeal of the superior court's denial of its motion to dismiss on the basis of sovereign immunity , and Reg Tech joined in the appeal filed by the State/liquidator .
See OCGA § 33–37–1 et seq.
Case No. A14A2119.
Case No. A14A2120.
--------
The Court of Appeals affirmed in part and reversed in part the judgment of the superior court, and remanded the case to it; however, the Court of Appeals was without jurisdiction to entertain the appeal. In Rivera v. Washington , 298 Ga. 770, 784 S.E.2d 775 (2016), this Court reaffirmed that the collateral order doctrine is extremely limited in its application and that it does not permit a direct appeal from the denial of a motion to dismiss based upon governmental immunity. Id. That was precisely the situation before the Court of Appeals. Consequently, the Court of Appeals should have dismissed the direct appeal before it for failure to follow the interlocutory appeal procedures. Id.
Accordingly, the judgment of the Court of Appeals is a ity, and we vacate the judgment of the Court of Appeals and remand for proceedings consistent with this opinion. See Kliesrath v. Estate of Davis , 298 Ga. 872, 786 S.E.2d 238 (2016).
Judgment vacated and case remanded with direction.
All the Justices concur.