From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Starling

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division
Dec 17, 1985
207 N.J. Super. 79 (App. Div. 1985)

Opinion

Submitted December 4, 1985 —

Decided December 17, 1985.

On appeal from the Superior Court, Law Division, Union County, 188 N.J. Super. 127, Menza, J.D.C. (temporarily assigned).

Before Judges KING and SCALERA.

Thomas S. Smith, Acting Public Defender, attorney for appellant ( Jeffrey A. Cohen, Designated Counsel, of counsel and on the brief). Irwin I. Kimmelman, Attorney General of New Jersey, attorney for respondent ( Jessica S. Oppenheim, Deputy Attorney General, of counsel and on the letter brief).


Defendant was convicted of second-degree burglary, N.J.S.A. 2C:18-2, third-degree theft, N.J.S.C.A. 2C:20-3, and unlawful possession of a firearm without a permit, N.J.S.A. 2C:39-5(b). He was sentenced to a ten-year state prison term with a three and one-half-year parole disqualifier.

On this appeal he raises three issues: (1) his confession was the fruit of an illegal arrest and inadmissible, (2) his confession was involuntary and should have been suppressed, and (3) his sentence was manifestly excessive. We find issues (1) and (3) to be clearly without merit and affirm. R. 2:11-3(e)(2). On issue (2) we affirm for the reasons stated in Judge Menza's published Law Division opinion appearing at 188 N.J. Super. 127 (Law Div. 1983).


Summaries of

State v. Starling

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division
Dec 17, 1985
207 N.J. Super. 79 (App. Div. 1985)
Case details for

State v. Starling

Case Details

Full title:STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. SAMUEL STARLING…

Court:Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division

Date published: Dec 17, 1985

Citations

207 N.J. Super. 79 (App. Div. 1985)
504 A.2d 18

Citing Cases

State v. Watford

In finding the statement admissible, the motion judge rejected defendant's argument that the confession was…

State v. Starling

Petition for certification denied. (See 207 N.J. Super. 79)…