From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. South

Supreme Court of Ohio
May 28, 2014
2014 Ohio 2245 (Ohio 2014)

Summary

In South, the Ninth District held, as we do today, that the maximum additional prison term that can be imposed for the underlying OVI offense is 36 months.

Summary of this case from State v. Weideman

Opinion

NO. 2014-0563

2014-05-28

State v. South



MOTION AND PROCEDURAL RULINGS


Summit App. No. 26967, 2014-Ohio-374. On review of order certifying a conflict. The court determines that a conflict exists. The parties are to brief the issue stated at page 1 of the court of appeals' entry filed March 17, 2014:

“When a defendant is convicted of a R.C. 2941.1413 specification, does Ohio's OVI statute, R.C. 4511.19 prevail so that a five year sentence can be imposed for a third degree felony OVI or does R.C. 2929.14(A) require that the maximum sentence that can be imposed is three years?”

The conflict case is State v. Sturgill, 12th Dist. Clermont Nos. CA2013–01–002 and CA2013–01–003, 2013-Ohio-4648.

O'Donnell, J., dissents.


Summaries of

State v. South

Supreme Court of Ohio
May 28, 2014
2014 Ohio 2245 (Ohio 2014)

In South, the Ninth District held, as we do today, that the maximum additional prison term that can be imposed for the underlying OVI offense is 36 months.

Summary of this case from State v. Weideman
Case details for

State v. South

Case Details

Full title:State v. South

Court:Supreme Court of Ohio

Date published: May 28, 2014

Citations

2014 Ohio 2245 (Ohio 2014)
139 Ohio St. 3d 1402
9 N.E.3d 1061

Citing Cases

State v. Weideman

{¶24} As an aside, we note that the Ohio Supreme Court has certified a conflict on this issue. State v.…

State v. Hensley

. We acknowledge that the Ohio Supreme Court is presently reviewing a conflict between this court's…