From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Soto-Maldonado

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
Oct 7, 2015
175 So. 3d 929 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2015)

Opinion

No. 2D14–452.

10-07-2015

STATE of Florida, Appellant, v. Anthony SOTO–MALDONADO, Appellee.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Elba Caridad Martin–Schomaker, Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, for Appellant. Bryant R. Camareno of Bryant R. Camareno, P.A., Tampa, for Appellee.


Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Elba Caridad Martin–Schomaker, Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, for Appellant.

Bryant R. Camareno of Bryant R. Camareno, P.A., Tampa, for Appellee.

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. See Exposito v. State, 891 So.2d 525, 531 (Fla.2004) (holding that the State does not have the right to appeal posttrial orders reducing a charge under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.620 ).

LaROSE, KHOUZAM, and BLACK, JJ., Concur.


Summaries of

State v. Soto-Maldonado

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
Oct 7, 2015
175 So. 3d 929 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2015)
Case details for

State v. Soto-Maldonado

Case Details

Full title:STATE of Florida, Appellant, v. Anthony SOTO–MALDONADO, Appellee.

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Date published: Oct 7, 2015

Citations

175 So. 3d 929 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2015)