From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Smith

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District
Apr 10, 1992
596 So. 2d 168 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1992)

Opinion

Nos. 91-3092, 91-3125.

April 10, 1992.

An appeal from an order of the Circuit Court for Escambia County; Judge Joseph Q. Tarbuck, in case number 91-3125.

Petition for writ of certiorari or mandamus in case number 91-3092.

Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., and Charlie McCoy, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellant in case number 91-3125.

Lawrence A. Kaden, Asst. State Atty., and Raymond L. Marky, Sp. Asst. State Atty., for petitioner in case number 91-3092.

Barry W. Beroset, Beroset Keene, Pensacola, for appellee, respondent.


ON REHEARING


On December 9, 1991, we issued our opinion wherein we found that the State of Florida could not obtain review, either by appeal or extraordinary writ, of an order which denied a motion to vacate an order terminating community control without notice to the State. We have now considered the State's motion for rehearing and find that our reliance on State v. Magrath, 517 So.2d 29 (Fla. 3d DCA 1987) was misplaced in light of State v. Pettis, 520 So.2d 250 (Fla. 1988); see also State v. Rhodes, 554 So.2d 1229 (Fla. 2d DCA 1990).

Accordingly, we withdraw our prior opinion and accept common law certiorari jurisdiction of case number 91-3092 pursuant to Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.030(b)(2)(A). Respondent shall show cause within 20 days why the petition for writ of certiorari should not be granted.

The appellate proceeding, case number 91-3125, shall remain dismissed for lack of jurisdiction.

JOANOS, C.J., and SHIVERS and ZEHMER, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

State v. Smith

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District
Apr 10, 1992
596 So. 2d 168 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1992)
Case details for

State v. Smith

Case Details

Full title:STATE OF FLORIDA, PETITIONER, v. CLINTON OWEN SMITH, RESPONDENT. STATE OF…

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District

Date published: Apr 10, 1992

Citations

596 So. 2d 168 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1992)