From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Smith

Supreme Court of Ohio
Oct 11, 1967
230 N.E.2d 551 (Ohio 1967)

Opinion

No. 40992

Decided October 11, 1967.

Criminal procedure — Right to counsel — Right to be advised — Plea of guilty without counsel — Postconviction proceeding — Duty of court.

APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Cuyahoga County.

This case is before the court on a motion to certify the record of the Court of Appeals affirming the judgment of the trial court denying appellant relief under the Postconviction Remedy Act.

In February 1949, appellant, without the aid of counsel, pleaded guilty to robbery.

Mr. John T. Corrigan, prosecuting attorney, and Mr. Lloyd O. Brown, for appellee.

Mr. Lonnie Smith, in propria persona.


In this action, appellant contends that he was not advised of his right to counsel nor was counsel offered to him. The Court of Common Pleas reached its decision denying relief in this case without a hearing. It is conceded by the state that appellant was not represented by counsel at the time he pleaded guilty. The state also concedes that the record is silent as to whether he was advised of his right to counsel.

In a case where an accused is not represented by counsel at his trial or at the time he pleads guilty and the record does not show whether the accused was advised of his right to counsel or that he intelligently waived counsel, it is incumbent on the court in a postconviction proceeding to conduct a hearing on such questions and make findings of fact in relation thereto.

Ordinarily, the court should appoint counsel to represent the petitioner in such instances. ( State v. Perry, 10 Ohio St.2d 175, footnote 2, at page 180.) However, if the record is silent and the state does not have and does not propose to introduce any evidence, the appointment of counsel may be unnecessary because there will in such instance necessarily be a finding in favor of the petitioner.

The motion to certify is allowed and the judgment of the Court of Appeals reversed. The cause is remanded to the Court of Common Pleas for further proceedings according to law.

Judgment reversed.

TAFT, C.J., ZIMMERMAN, MATTHIAS, O'NEILL, HERBERT, SCHNEIDER and BROWN, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

State v. Smith

Supreme Court of Ohio
Oct 11, 1967
230 N.E.2d 551 (Ohio 1967)
Case details for

State v. Smith

Case Details

Full title:THE STATE OF OHIO, APPELLEE v. SMITH, APPELLANT

Court:Supreme Court of Ohio

Date published: Oct 11, 1967

Citations

230 N.E.2d 551 (Ohio 1967)
230 N.E.2d 551

Citing Cases

Knox v. Maxwell

"In a case where an accused is not represented by counsel at his trial or at the time he pleads guilty and…

State v. Bryant

In a case where an accused is not represented by counsel at the time he pleads guilty and the record does not…