From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Smith

Supreme Court of New Jersey
Nov 18, 1977
75 N.J. 81 (N.J. 1977)

Opinion

Argued October 18, 1977 —

Decided November 18, 1977.

On appeal from the Superior Court, Appellate Division, whose opinion is reported at 140 N.J. Super. 368 (1976).

Ms. Randall W. Westreich, Designated Counsel, argued the cause for appellant ( Mr. Stanley C. Van Ness, Public Defender, attorney).

Mr. Burrell Ives Humphreys, Passaic County Prosecutor, argued the cause for respondent ( Mr. Humphreys, attorney; Mr. Gary S. Schlyen, Assistant Prosecutor, of counsel and on the brief).

Mr. John DeCicco, Deputy Attorney General, argued the cause for amicus curiae Attorney General ( Mr. William F. Hyland, Attorney General of New Jersey, attorney; Ms. Marianne Espinosa, Deputy Attorney General, of counsel and on the brief).


The judgment is affirmed substantially for the reasons expressed in the opinion of the Appellate Division, 140 N.J. Super. 368.

For affirmance — Justices MOUNTAIN, SULLIVAN, PASHMAN, CLIFFORD and SCHREIBER — 5.

For reversal — None.


Summaries of

State v. Smith

Supreme Court of New Jersey
Nov 18, 1977
75 N.J. 81 (N.J. 1977)
Case details for

State v. Smith

Case Details

Full title:STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. WILLIE D. SMITH…

Court:Supreme Court of New Jersey

Date published: Nov 18, 1977

Citations

75 N.J. 81 (N.J. 1977)
379 A.2d 1275

Citing Cases

State v. Y.W.

[State v. Smith, 140 N.J. Super. 368, 373 (App. Div. 1976), aff'd o.b. 75 N.J. 81 (1977) (emphasis added;…

State v. Williams

It then concluded the protective sweep was reasonable under Maryland v. Buie, 494 U.S. 325, 335-36, 110 S.…