From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Smith

Supreme Court of Louisiana
Sep 20, 2002
827 So. 2d 1122 (La. 2002)

Opinion

No. 02-KK-1842

September 20, 2002

IN RE: State of Louisiana; — Plaintiff Applying for Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of Orleans, Criminal District Court Div. K, Nos. 423-290; to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, No. 2002-K-1278

ON WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE FOURTH CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEAL


Granted with order. See per curiam.

JLW

PFC

CDK

JPV

CDT

JTK

JOHNSON, J., dissents from order.


Granted. The ruling of the district court granting respondent's motion to suppress is reversed and this case is remanded for further proceedings. A warrant authorizing the search of a particularly described premises permits the search of vehicles owned or controlled by the owner of, and found on, the premises. United States v. Evans, 92 F.3d 540, 543 (7th Cir. 1996); United States v. Singer, 970 F.2d 1414, 1418 (5th Cir. 1992); United States v. Percival, 756 F.2d 600, 612 (7th Cir. 1985); United States v. Napoli, 530 F.2d 1198, 1200-01 (5th Cir. 1976);see also 2 Wayne R. LaFave, Search and Seizure, § 4.10(b), p. 667 (1996) ("The assumption seems to be that a vehicle should be viewed in the same way as any other personal effects found on the described premises."). In the present case, as described by testimony at the hearing on the motion to suppress, the fence which splits the driveway of defendant's home "serves to demark a specific area of land immediately adjacent to the house that is readily identifiable as part and parcel of the house." United States v. Dunn, 480 U.S. 294, 302, 107 S.Ct. 1134, 1140, 94 L.Ed.2d 326 (1987). The vehicle located next to the house in that area of land behind the fence was therefore on the premises targeted for the search and subject to the authority of the warrant because it was capable of concealing the sought-after contraband. See United States v. Ross, 456 U.S. 798, 820-21, 102 S.Ct. 2157, 2170-71, 72 L.Ed.2d 572 (1982) ("A lawful search of fixed premises generally extends to the entire area in which the object of the search may be found and is not limited by the possibility that separate acts of entry or opening may be required to complete the search.").


Summaries of

State v. Smith

Supreme Court of Louisiana
Sep 20, 2002
827 So. 2d 1122 (La. 2002)
Case details for

State v. Smith

Case Details

Full title:STATE OF LOUISIANA v. BARRY SMITH

Court:Supreme Court of Louisiana

Date published: Sep 20, 2002

Citations

827 So. 2d 1122 (La. 2002)

Citing Cases

People v. Gordon

Applying Ross, I would likewise hold that, where a warrant authorizes a search of the entire premises for…