From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Smith

Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Apr 30, 2014
91 A.3d 462 (Conn. 2014)

Opinion

2014-04-30

STATE of Connecticut v. Tremaine S. SMITH.

Mitchell S. Brody, senior assistant state's attorney, in support of the petition. Elizabeth M. Inkster, assigned counsel, and Samuel Greenberg, assigned counsel, in opposition.


Mitchell S. Brody, senior assistant state's attorney, in support of the petition. Elizabeth M. Inkster, assigned counsel, and Samuel Greenberg, assigned counsel, in opposition.

The petition by the state of Connecticut for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 148 Conn.App. 684, 86 A.3d 498, is granted, limited to the following issue:

“Did the Appellate Court properly determine that the defendant's conviction of attempt to commit robbery in the first degree in violation of General Statutes §§ 53a–49(a)(2) and 53a–134(a)(3) must be reversed and judgment directed because there was insufficient evidence to convict him of attempt to commit robbery in the first degree?”


Summaries of

State v. Smith

Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Apr 30, 2014
91 A.3d 462 (Conn. 2014)
Case details for

State v. Smith

Case Details

Full title:STATE of Connecticut v. Tremaine S. SMITH.

Court:Supreme Court of Connecticut.

Date published: Apr 30, 2014

Citations

91 A.3d 462 (Conn. 2014)
311 Conn. 947

Citing Cases

State v. Smith

Id., at 721. Thereafter, we granted the state's petition for certification to appeal on the following issue:…