From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

STATE v. SISK

Supreme Court of North Carolina
Apr 1, 1997
483 S.E.2d 440 (N.C. 1997)

Opinion

No. 371A96

Filed 11 April 1997

Appeal by defendant pursuant to N.C.G.S. § 7A-30(2) from the decision of a divided panel of the Court of Appeals, 123 N.C. App. 361, 473 S.E.2d 348 (1996), affirming a judgment entered by DeRamus, J., on 24 March 1995 in Superior Court, Forsyth County. On 7 November 1996 this Court allowed defendant's petition for discretionary review as to an additional issue. Heard in the Supreme Court 20 March 1997.

Michael F. Easley, Attorney General, by J. Philip Allen, Assistant Attorney General, for the State.

Paul M. James, III, for defendant-appellant.


The decision of the Court of Appeals is affirmed for the reasons stated in the majority opinion by Judge Johnson. We hold that defendant's petition for discretionary review as to an additional issue was improvidently allowed.

AFFIRMED IN PART; DISCRETIONARY REVIEW IMPROVIDENTLY ALLOWED IN PART.


Summaries of

STATE v. SISK

Supreme Court of North Carolina
Apr 1, 1997
483 S.E.2d 440 (N.C. 1997)
Case details for

STATE v. SISK

Case Details

Full title:STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA v. AMY JANE SISK

Court:Supreme Court of North Carolina

Date published: Apr 1, 1997

Citations

483 S.E.2d 440 (N.C. 1997)
483 S.E.2d 440

Citing Cases

State v. Lawson

In order for this Court to find that the error affecting defendant's constitutional rights was harmless…