From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Simmons

Supreme Court of Louisiana.
Oct 12, 2012
99 So. 3d 28 (La. 2012)

Summary

applying Miller retroactively

Summary of this case from In re Simpson

Opinion

No. 2011–KP–1810.

2012-10-12

STATE of Louisiana v. Emerson W. SIMMONS.


In re Simmons, Emerson W.;—Defendant; Applying For Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of Jefferson, 24th Judicial District Court Divs. B, N, Nos. 95–0511, 95–3703; to the Court of Appeal, Fifth Circuit, No. 11–KH–667.
PER CURIAM.

[2011-1810 (La. 1]Writ granted. Relator is presently serving a sentence of life imprisonment at hard labor without possibility of parole for a second degree murder committed in 1995 when he was 17 years old. The sentence was mandated by the penalty provision of the statute establishing the offense. La.R.S. 14:30.1(B). In 2011, relator filed a motion to correct an illegal sentence in which he contended that a sentence of life imprisonment without parole for a juvenile offender is no longer constitutionally permissible under developing legal standards, and in particular in light of Graham v. Florida, 560 U.S. ––––, 130 S.Ct. 2011, 176 L.Ed.2d 825 (2010) (Eight Amendment precludes sentencing juvenile offenders to life imprisonment without parole for non-homicide crimes). The district court denied relief. While review of that judgment was pending, the United States Supreme Court determined that mandatory life imprisonment without parole for those offenders under the age of 18 years at the time they committed a homicide offense violates the Eighth Amendment prohibition of “cruel and unusual punishments.” Miller v. Alabama, 567 U.S. ––––, ––––, 132 S.Ct. 2455, 2466, 183 L.Ed.2d 407 (2012). Unlike the [2011-1810 (La. 2]case in Graham, the Miller court did not prohibit life imprisonment without parole for juveniles, but instead required that a sentencing court consider an offender's youth and attendant characteristics as mitigating circumstances before deciding whether to impose the harshest possible penalty for juveniles who have committed a homicide offense. Therefore, we grant to remand to the district court for reconsideration after conducting a sentencing hearing in accord with the principles enunciated in Miller and stating the reasons for reconsideration and sentencing on the record.


Summaries of

State v. Simmons

Supreme Court of Louisiana.
Oct 12, 2012
99 So. 3d 28 (La. 2012)

applying Miller retroactively

Summary of this case from In re Simpson

remanding for resentencing on collateral review in light of Miller

Summary of this case from In re Morgan

allowing for resentencing on collateral review in light of Miller

Summary of this case from Hill v. Snyder

remanding for a sentencing hearing under Miller

Summary of this case from Commonwealth v. Cunningham

remanding to the district court for reconsideration of the defendant's sentence of life imprisonment at hard labor without possibility of parole imposed in 1995 in light of Miller and requiring the court to make findings on the record

Summary of this case from State v. Null
Case details for

State v. Simmons

Case Details

Full title:STATE of Louisiana v. Emerson W. SIMMONS.

Court:Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Date published: Oct 12, 2012

Citations

99 So. 3d 28 (La. 2012)

Citing Cases

State v. Tate

As the Louisiana Supreme Court found in two per curiam opinions, the Court did not prohibit life imprisonment…

White v. Premo

’ " (Quoting Miller , 567 U.S. at 479-80, 132 S.Ct. 2455.)). Second, the Court has instructed that only the…