From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Sholedice

Court of Appeals of Oregon.
Jan 5, 2017
283 Or. App. 346 (Or. Ct. App. 2017)

Opinion

A158781

01-05-2017

State of Oregon, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Nathan Russell Sholedice, Defendant-Appellant.

George W. Kelly, Eugene, argued the cause and filed the briefs for appellant. David B. Thompson, Portland, Assistant Attorney General, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the answering brief were Ellen F. Rosenblum, Attorney General, and Paul L. Smith, Deputy Solicitor General. With him on the supplemental answering brief were Ellen F. Rosenblum, Attorney General, and Benjamin Gutman, Solicitor General.


George W. Kelly, Eugene, argued the cause and filed the briefs for appellant.

David B. Thompson, Portland, Assistant Attorney General, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the answering brief were Ellen F. Rosenblum, Attorney General, and Paul L. Smith, Deputy Solicitor General. With him on the supplemental answering brief were Ellen F. Rosenblum, Attorney General, and Benjamin Gutman, Solicitor General.

Before DeVore, Presiding Judge, and Garrett, Judge, and Wollheim, Senior Judge.

PER CURIAMReversed and remanded. State v. Barnthouse , 271 Or.App. 312, 350 P.3d 536 (2015), aff'd on other grounds , 360 Or. 403, 380 P.3d 952 (2016) (holding that, for purposes of Article I, section 9, of the Oregon Constitution, law enforcement illegally seized a package by removing it from the stream of mail and submitting it to a dog sniff).


Summaries of

State v. Sholedice

Court of Appeals of Oregon.
Jan 5, 2017
283 Or. App. 346 (Or. Ct. App. 2017)
Case details for

State v. Sholedice

Case Details

Full title:State of Oregon, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Nathan Russell Sholedice…

Court:Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Date published: Jan 5, 2017

Citations

283 Or. App. 346 (Or. Ct. App. 2017)
283 Or. App. 346

Citing Cases

State v. Smith

Before Duncan, Presiding Judge, and DeVore, Judge, and Garrett, Judge.PER CURIAMThe state filed a petition…

State v. Sholedice

The Court of Appeals reversed, reasoning that defendants had a constitutionally protected property interest…