From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Shane Miller

Oregon Court of Appeals
Oct 27, 2010
242 P.3d 689 (Or. Ct. App. 2010)

Opinion

Nos. 08C48743; A142126.

Argued and submitted September 20, 2010.

October 27, 2010.

Appeal from the Marion County Circuit Court, Albin W. Norblad, Judge.

Jason E. Thompson argued the cause for appellant. With him on the brief was Ferder Casebeer French Thompson, LLP.

Matthew J. Lysne, Assistant Attorney General, argued the cause for respondent. On the brief were John R. Kroger, Attorney General, Jerome Lidz, Solicitor General, and Anna M. Joyce, Assistant Attorney General.

Before Brewer, Chief Judge, and Edmonds, Senior Judge.


PER CURIAM

Reversed and remanded.


Defendant appeals from his convictions on two counts of first-degree sexual abuse, arguing that the trial court erred in admitting expert testimony by a pediatrician diagnosing sexual abuse in the absence of any physical evidence. Defendant did not preserve that argument in the trial court, however, admission of such evidence is plain error under State v. Southard, 347 Or. 127, 218 P.3d 104 (2009). For the reasons set forth in State v. Merrimon, 234 Or. App. 515, 522, 228 P.3d 666 (2010), and State v. Lovern, 234 Or. App. 502, 513-14, 228 P.3d 688 (2010), we exercise our discretion to correct that error. Accordingly, we reverse and remand.

Reversed and remanded.


Summaries of

State v. Shane Miller

Oregon Court of Appeals
Oct 27, 2010
242 P.3d 689 (Or. Ct. App. 2010)
Case details for

State v. Shane Miller

Case Details

Full title:STATE OF OREGON, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. JOEL SHANE MILLER…

Court:Oregon Court of Appeals

Date published: Oct 27, 2010

Citations

242 P.3d 689 (Or. Ct. App. 2010)
242 P.3d 689

Citing Cases

Sartin v. Taylor

Southard and Lupoli —both decided before petitioner's trial—did significantly change the law, holding that…