From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Sesler

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District
Jul 23, 1980
386 So. 2d 293 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1980)

Summary

holding that the trial court erred in failing to impose a mandatory minimum sentence pursuant to section 775.087, Florida Statutes, because the sentence was nondiscretionary and a matter of legislative prerogative

Summary of this case from State v. Thompson

Opinion

No. 80-319.

July 23, 1980.

Appeal from the Circuit Court, Polk County, Gunter Stephenson, J.

Jim Smith, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Michael Kotler, Asst. Atty. Gen., Tampa, for appellant.

Jack O. Johnson, Public Defender, and P. Douglas Brinkmeyer, Asst. Public Defender, Bartow, for appellee.


The state contends that the trial court erred in refusing to impose the mandatory three-year minimum sentence upon Sesler under Section 775.087(2), Florida Statutes (1979). We agree.

In September of 1979, the state charged Sesler with aggravated battery. A jury found him guilty of aggravated assault with a firearm, a lesser-included offense of aggravated battery. The court withheld adjudication and ordered a presentence investigation. At the sentencing hearing, the state requested that the court sentence Sesler pursuant to Section 775.087(2). The court declined, explaining that because the victim had been partially at fault, it would be a "miscarriage of justice" to imprison Sesler for three years. The court then placed Sesler on five years probation. The court erred because Section 775.087(2) clearly requires a trial court to sentence a defendant convicted of aggravated assault with a firearm to a minimum of three years in prison. See D'Alessandro v. Shearer, 360 So.2d 774 (Fla. 1978); State v. Opitz, 357 So.2d 469 (Fla. 2d DCA 1978).

While we recognize the problems inherent in the uniform imposition of a minimum sentence, this area is a matter of legislative prerogative and is nondiscretionary. Accordingly, we have no alternative but to remand to the trial court with directions to vacate the prior sentence and impose sentence as required by Section 775.087(2), Florida Statutes (1979).

BOARDMAN and GRIMES, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

State v. Sesler

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District
Jul 23, 1980
386 So. 2d 293 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1980)

holding that the trial court erred in failing to impose a mandatory minimum sentence pursuant to section 775.087, Florida Statutes, because the sentence was nondiscretionary and a matter of legislative prerogative

Summary of this case from State v. Thompson

holding that the trial court erred in failing to impose a mandatory minimum sentence pursuant to section 775.087, Florida Statutes, because the sentence was nondiscretionary and a matter of legislative prerogative

Summary of this case from State v. Thompson
Case details for

State v. Sesler

Case Details

Full title:STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLANT, v. CARNELL SESLER, APPELLEE

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District

Date published: Jul 23, 1980

Citations

386 So. 2d 293 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1980)

Citing Cases

Van Buren v. State

There exists an obligation to correct a sentence to comply with applicable statutory provisions, even if the…

State v. Thompson

Whether imposition of the 20-year mandatory term would be a "crime in itself," as stated by the trial court,…