From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Seneca Cty

Supreme Court of Ohio
Oct 2, 2007
115 Ohio St. 3d 1418 (Ohio 2007)

Opinion

No. 2007-1694.

October 2, 2007.


MOTION AND PROCEDURAL RULINGS.

In Mandamus. This cause originated in this court on the filing of a complaint for a mandamus. Upon consideration thereof,

It is ordered by the court, sua sponte, that an alternative writ is granted and the following briefing schedule is set for presentation of evidence and filing of briefs pursuant to S.Ct.Prac.R. X:

Relator's brief and evidence is due within seven days from the date of this entry; respondent's brief and evidence is due within seven days after the filing of relator's brief; and relator may file a reply brief within three days after the filing of respondent's brief.

It is further ordered that relator's request for ancillary injunctive relief is denied. PFEIFER, J., dissents and would dismiss the cause.

O'CONNOR, J., not participating.


Summaries of

State v. Seneca Cty

Supreme Court of Ohio
Oct 2, 2007
115 Ohio St. 3d 1418 (Ohio 2007)
Case details for

State v. Seneca Cty

Case Details

Full title:State ex rel. Toledo Blade Co. v. Seneca Cty. Bd. of Commrs

Court:Supreme Court of Ohio

Date published: Oct 2, 2007

Citations

115 Ohio St. 3d 1418 (Ohio 2007)
2007 Ohio 5231

Citing Cases

Toledo Blade Co. v. Seneca Cty. Bd.

In addition, the Blade sought ancillary injunctive relief, including a temporary restraining order, to…