From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Schweiter

Oregon Court of Appeals
Sep 27, 2006
144 P.3d 1006 (Or. Ct. App. 2006)

Opinion

Nos. 03FE1370MS; A126756.

Submitted on record and brief August 18, 2006.

September 27, 2006.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Deschutes County. Michael C. Sullivan, Judge.

Peter A. Ozanne, Executive Director, Peter Gartlan, Chief Defender, Legal Services Division, and Rebecca Duncan, Chief Deputy Public Defender, Office of Defense Services, filed the brief for appellant.

Hardy Myers, Attorney General, Mary H. Williams, Solicitor General, and Jonathan H. Fussner, Attorney-In-Charge, Criminal Appeals Unit, filed the brief for respondent.

Before Schuman, Presiding Judge, and Ortega and Rosenblum, Judges.


PER CURIAM

Reversed and remanded with instructions to enter a judgment reflecting four separate findings of guilt merging into one conviction, and for resentencing; otherwise affirmed.


Defendant was convicted of attempted assault in the fourth degree, ORS 163.160(3)(c), based on a single assault committed in the presence of four child witnesses. The trial court entered four convictions. Defendant contends that, under State v. Glaspey, 337 Or 558, 100 P3d 730 (2004), only one conviction was justified because the child witnesses are not "victims." The state concedes that Glaspey controls the outcome of this case and that the trial court erred by not merging the separate convictions into a single one. We agree and accept the concession.

Reversed and remanded with instructions to enter a judgment reflecting four separate findings of guilt merging into one conviction, and for resentencing; otherwise affirmed.


Summaries of

State v. Schweiter

Oregon Court of Appeals
Sep 27, 2006
144 P.3d 1006 (Or. Ct. App. 2006)
Case details for

State v. Schweiter

Case Details

Full title:STATE OF OREGON, Respondent, v. JOHN SCHWEITER, Appellant

Court:Oregon Court of Appeals

Date published: Sep 27, 2006

Citations

144 P.3d 1006 (Or. Ct. App. 2006)
144 P.3d 1006

Citing Cases

Chapman v. Boynton

Section 21 was amended to read: In all indictments under the provisions of this act, it shall not be…

Whitson v. State

* * * `The offense complained of worked no injury upon the individual rights of the person to whom the sale…