From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Schanus

Minnesota Court of Appeals
Nov 8, 1988
431 N.W.2d 151 (Minn. Ct. App. 1988)

Summary

holding no "cross-appeal or notice of review is permitted the state when a defendant appeals from a conviction"

Summary of this case from STATE v. ALTO

Opinion

No. C7-88-2040.

November 8, 1988.

Appeal from the District Court, Dakota County, Gerald Kalina, J.

Hubert H. Humphrey, III, Atty. Gen., Paul R. Kempainen, Asst. Atty. Gen., St. Paul, James C. Backstrom, Dakota County Atty., Robert King, Jr., Asst. Dakota County Atty., Hastings, for respondent.

C. Paul Jones, State Public Defender, Cathryn Middlebrook, Asst. Public Defender, Minneapolis, for appellant.

Considered at Special Term and decided by WOZNIAK, C.J., and FORSBERG and SCHUMACHER, JJ., without oral argument.


SPECIAL TERM OPINION


FACTS

Schanus timely appealed his felony conviction. The state filed a notice of review after the time for appeal had expired, challenging a sentencing departure. Schanus moved to dismiss the notice of review and the state did not respond.

DECISION

The state may appeal from a sentence "according to the rules of criminal procedure[.]" Minn.Stat. § 244.11 (1986). Minn.R.Crim.P. 28.05, subd. 1(1), which governs sentencing appeals, requires that any appeal from a sentence be filed "within 90 days after judgment and sentencing."

The state did not timely file any appeal from the sentence. Instead, it filed a notice of review more than 90 days after Shanus was sentenced. A notice of review is authorized in civil appeals, and it may be served and filed by a respondent within 15 days after the appellant serves the appeal papers. Minn.R.Civ.App.P. 106.

As noted, the criminal rules govern review of the state's challenge to a sentence. The criminal rules do not authorize such challenges by a notice of review. A defendant may file a cross-appeal within ten days after the state serves an appeal from a pretrial order. Minn.R.Crim.P. 28.04, subd. 3. No such cross-appeal or notice of review is permitted the state when a defendant appeals from a conviction. Cf. Minn.R.Crim.P. 28.02. The state's challenge to a sentence is barred where it "did not appeal the sentence as it could have under Minn.R.Crim.P. 28.04." State v. Marshall, 411 N.W.2d 276, 281 (Minn.Ct.App. 1987), pet. for rev. denied (Minn. Oct. 26, 1987).

NOTICE OF REVIEW DISMISSED.


Summaries of

State v. Schanus

Minnesota Court of Appeals
Nov 8, 1988
431 N.W.2d 151 (Minn. Ct. App. 1988)

holding no "cross-appeal or notice of review is permitted the state when a defendant appeals from a conviction"

Summary of this case from STATE v. ALTO

requiring that the state raise issues in accordance with the Minnesota Rules of Criminal Procedure.

Summary of this case from State v. Maldonado
Case details for

State v. Schanus

Case Details

Full title:STATE of Minnesota, Respondent, v. Michael E. SCHANUS, Appellant

Court:Minnesota Court of Appeals

Date published: Nov 8, 1988

Citations

431 N.W.2d 151 (Minn. Ct. App. 1988)

Citing Cases

Waynewood v. State

The state may not file a notice of review in a criminal appeal. State v. Schanus, 431 N.W.2d 151, 152…

State v. Maldonado

The state did not seek direct appeal from the sentence as is provided for in the Minnesota Rules of Criminal…