From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Santiago

Supreme Court of Connecticut
Jan 22, 2003
262 Conn. 939 (Conn. 2003)

Opinion

Decided January 22, 2003


The petition by the state of Connecticut for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 73 Conn. App. 205 (AC 20812), is granted, limited to the following issue:

"Did the Appellate Court properly conclude that the state engaged in prosecutorial misconduct, and that the misconduct deprived the defendant of a fair trial?"

The Supreme Court docket number is SC 16918.

James M. Ralls, assistant state's attorney, in support of the petition.

Darcy McGraw, special public defender, in opposition.


Summaries of

State v. Santiago

Supreme Court of Connecticut
Jan 22, 2003
262 Conn. 939 (Conn. 2003)
Case details for

State v. Santiago

Case Details

Full title:STATE OF CONNECTICUT v. DANIEL SANTIAGO

Court:Supreme Court of Connecticut

Date published: Jan 22, 2003

Citations

262 Conn. 939 (Conn. 2003)
815 A.2d 673

Citing Cases

State v. Samuels

Prosecutorial misconduct is probably the most notable reason for the deprivation of a defendant's right to a…

Pagliaro v. Jones

(Internal quotation marks omitted.) State v. Santiago, 73 Conn. App. 205, 234, 807 A.2d 1048 (2002), cert.…